Thought the UK primarily had MLC 70 bridges so this is surprising. Neither 74 short tons nor 74 long tons equates to 62.5 metric tons. The long ton, the imperial unit, is slightly more than 1000kg. The bog standard Challenger 2 is 62.5 metric tonnes, this behemoth is 74 metric tonnes. Since it entered service in the late 90's, Challenger 2 has been a controversial tank, with several features seeming outdated or regressive. For over a decad Good players know that Challenger 2/2F are brawlers. You get in close, use your crazy reload and above average armor to tank shots. Additionally its disadvantages in mobility are diminished the closer you get; the tanks tend to perform poorly on maps that emphasize flanking and maneuver. Flank1x. OP • 2 yr. ago. "The Leopard is not as good a tank one-on-one, but I'll take 400 Leopard over 10 Challenger 2," Crump said. The powerful Challenger 2 tanks would easily outmatch Russia's battle tanks, mainly Challenger 2: British tank buster that has 'never' been destroyed The British Challenger 2 is a main battle tank that has been used on operations in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Iraq. The UK plans to supply Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine. early warning signs. The Ukrainian military received its first warning signs of the combat potential of its British armor in January, when senior officers of the British Armed Forces explicitly told their Kiev counterparts to avoid deploying the tanks in areas where could be captured or destroyed by Russia. The Challenger 2 tank marks a step change in capability for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, ensuring they are better able to protect their crews and offering them some of the most modern and British Challenger 2 main battle tank. Matthew Revell // Getty Images The general was asked a question by Senator Tom Cotton which tanks, if any, were competitive with the Abrams. s84dmg.

is the challenger 2 tank any good